The Bloom House

Property owner directly behind the site said she and her neighbors are wholeheartedly opposed, circulated a signed petition, and raised privacy, traffic, safety, and property value concerns.

A retired hospital worker and substitute teacher said the use is still a business in a residential neighborhood and worried about property values and children's safety.

A retired social worker who supports the work but said reunification visits are high-risk cases that don't belong in an unsecured residential setting, citing deaths at supervised visits elsewhere and unequal enforcement across neighborhoods.

Owns the house next door at 2517; raised parking limits, unknown visitors, unreliable supervision, and devaluation of her property.

A broker managing nearby rentals called the concept noble but said notices were confusing, worried nonprofits could profit, and warned approving it opens the door to rehab and assisted-living homes in residential areas.

A Greenacres resident since 1985 with a medical background said the street is too narrow, urged a commercial location with security, and said visits are unsafe in a neighborhood.